Structural holes, or “Why is Enterprise 2.0 a good idea?”
I attended the Enterprise 2.0 Summit at CeBIT in Hannover last March. It was great, and it's kind of embarrassing…
Enterprise 2.x == Web science, or why “engineering” is a dead end for information system design
Web Science: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding the Web I'm not a big fan of the engineering metaphor for my…
XML sucks at basketball
XML Fever Reading the latest issue of CACM today, and really enjoying the new format and content. The article linked…
Office 2.0 Conference : Office 2.0 Blog: Community Power
Office 2.0 Conference : Office 2.0 Blog: Community Power I sure wish I was going to this event (and I…
The End of Cyberspace: Proust and the Squid: The reader as cyborg
The End of Cyberspace: Proust and the Squid: The reader as cyborg And as long as I'm linking to Alex,…
RESTafarian Workflow / BPM Ganja
Interesting couple of days with regard to the (never ending) debate between proponents of SOA and proponents of ROA. On…
Fog2.0
Fog2.0 First lazy day off in a very long time, so I'm working through me backlog of nearly 3000 unread…
BPMN BPEL Roundtripping Revisited
Roundtripping Revisited +1. Good stuff, as usual, from Bruce Silver. The underlying rule of thumb here, I think, is something…
The problem is green-screen, mainframe-based ideas of “process”
Making Enterprise Software Sexier: Repeatable Process Without Endless Boredom Woot! Bob knocks one out of the park: In part, I…
Enterprise 2.0: The Death Of Slow Business Process | Bex Huff
Enterprise 2.0: The Death Of Slow Business Process | Bex Huff Relying on a process instead of people is a…
